Home/Main Results

Main Results

Six models optimize 25 tasks over 12–24 hours. Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 17 task wins.

6 models25 tasks150 runs80 GB H100 GPUs

Experimental setup

We evaluate GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5, Qwen 3.8 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, and GPT-6 Astra on every task, yielding 150 task–model runs. Claude uses Claude Code; the other five models use Codex CLI. Reasoning effort is set to max.

Experiments use NVIDIA H100 GPUs with 80 GB per GPU. Operators receive 12-hour budgets; modules and systems receive 24 hours. We report the best valid private-test score within each run’s budget. The main-experiment allocation totals 10,512 GPU-hours, including Work, the continuously allocated Judge, and dedicated serving backends.

Performance over time

Performance on 12 tasks

Twelve tasks span training and inference at operator, module, and system levels. Curves show valid best-so-far private-test scores over each task’s budget.
Twelve tasks span training and inference at operator, module, and system levels. Curves show valid best-so-far private-test scores over each task’s budget.

Progress after long plateaus

51 of 150 runs set a new best score after at least a quarter of their budget without improvement. In 29 of those runs, the new score is more than 1% above the preceding best.

For Qwen on Quant-VideoGen KV Codec, the best score stays at 6.05 for 6.78 hours before rising to 8.58.

Statistics

A run contributes once to each plateau statistic. A long plateau lasts at least a quarter of the run’s budget; the larger-gain statistic requires a new best score more than 1% above the preceding best.

Final performance

Claude Opus 5.5 leads overall, with 17 task wins and a mean rank score of 91.2.

Overall rank scores across 25 tasks
#ModelRank scoreTask wins
1Claude Opus 5.591.217 / 25
2GPT-6 Astra75.26 / 25
3GPT-6.1 Sol54.41 / 25
4Qwen 3.8 Flash40.81 / 25
5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash30.40 / 25
6GLM 5.3 Flash8.00 / 25

Each task ranks the six models by its final valid score, with average ranks for exact ties. Rank score rescales the mean rank to 0–100 with equal task weights; 100 means first on every task.

Rank-based final performance

Markers show mean rank scores across the tasks in each group. Error bars show ±1 standard error of the mean. Higher is better.
Markers show mean rank scores across the tasks in each group. Error bars show ±1 standard error of the mean. Higher is better.

Strengths differ across tasks

Claude wins nine operators, two modules, and six systems. Astra wins six tasks; Sol and Qwen win one each. The three inference-module tasks have three different winners: Sol on kvpress KV Eviction, Astra on KVzip KV Scoring, and Claude on Quant-VideoGen KV Codec.

Astra has the highest mean rank score on inference modules, 86.7, compared with Claude’s 80.0. Qwen wins Concurrent Agent Serving at 154.33 valid steps/min, compared with Claude’s 151.17.

Complete task trajectories

View all 25 tasks and 150 runs

Complete trajectories: first task group

Task score trajectories across six models.
Task score trajectories across six models.

Complete trajectories: remaining tasks

Task score trajectories across six models.
Task score trajectories across six models.

Interactive task results ↗

Figure